utorak, 17. prosinca 2013.

So is it plagiarism?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/11/04/rand-pauls-plagiarism-allegations-and-why-they-matter/

Paul has argued that his speeches aren’t meant to be meticulously footnoted academic papers.
Kad ono...

But Paul’s problem is that some passages were used verbatim (or very close to it). Whether you think plagiarism is a major sin or not, it’s pretty clear that this is plagiarism. 

Amerikanci zbilja vole "pomoću kruškinih mjerila diskreditirati jabuku".[1]

Nema komentara:

Objavi komentar